Heathrow airport expansion cover-up

THE Department for Transport (DfT) is facing a criminal investigation following a complaint that it deleted sensitive internal emails about the expansion of Heathrow airport.

It is accused of disposing of emails to and from the airport’s operator, BAA, between September and November 2007 as the government prepared to push through its controversial plans for a third runway.

The investigation unit of the Information Commissioner’s Office, staffed by former police officers, has asked to interview civil servants at the DfT about the apparent destruction of evidence.

The emails were requested under freedom of information laws by Justine Greening, a Tory frontbencher, who has led the campaign against the £9 billion expansion. She asked for an investigation after spotting gaps in email conversations between transport officials and BAA.

One email sent between the DfT and BAA on November 1, 2007 referred to potentially damaging information and asked: “Can we play down?” The reply is among those emails that have apparently gone missing.

Greening said: “I have been trying to obtain these crucial discussions about the Heathrow consultation for nearly two years. When they were released it was clear that some of the material was missing. The deletion of these emails could be a criminal offence and I am very pleased that the information commissioner is investigating.”

She suspects that the missing emails could show that government officials skewed the evidence in collusion with BAA in favour of expansion.

Geoff Hoon, then the transport secretary, approved the third runway in January 2009 and indicated he would rush the project through to make it difficult for the Tories, who are against expansion, to overturn the decision.

Opponents of Heathrow expansion seized on news of the investigation as ammunition for their judicial challenge to the way the government pressed ahead. The case will be heard in the High Court this month.

Edward Lister, leader of Wandsworth council in southwest London, who is among those bringing the legal challenge, said: “We are looking to show that the government hasn’t played fair all along. Our case will show a government determined to force through the runway at any cost.”

Lawyers acting for opponents of Heathrow expansion believe that the apparent destruction of internal communications about Heathrow demonstrates “bad faith” and could strengthen their case that the consultation was flawed.

Other opponents include Greenpeace, the RSPB and residents of Sipson village, where 700 families will lose their homes if a third runway is built.

Greening has been notified in writing by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) that it is planning “quite an intensive investigation in a short timescale with the limited resources available to our office”. The ICO, which is also conducting an inquiry into the “climategate” emails scandal at the University of East Anglia, said such investigations were rare. The deletion or concealment of records to prevent disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act is a criminal offence.

BAA is not covered by the act and staff are therefore not required to retain material. However, they are to be interviewed about the missing emails.

The DfT confirmed it had received an interview request from watchdog investigators. “We are aware of a possible investigation by the ICO but have not received any formal notice,” it said.

The ICO said: “We are looking into allegations made by Justine Greening MP concerning requests for information to the Department for Transport. We have contacted BAA and the DfT to help us establish the full facts.”

Reported in The Times Online 07-02-2010

In a freedom of information request to Newham Council it has been revealed that complaints made directly to them about noise from London City Airport have risen by a massive 2,650% over a period of 5 years.

Whilst Newham Council and London City Airport have gone to great pains to justify expansion, they have often claimed that complaint levels were low, alledgedly suggesting that there had not been any real increase in complaint levels over the years.

Even more shockingly, this massive increase only represents those complaints made directly to Newham Council. It does NOT include complaints made directly to London City Airport, National Air Traffic Systems, MPs, Councillors, the Civil Aviation Authority or any other London Borough such as Redbridge, Greenwich, Tower Hamlets, Barking & Dagenham, Bexley and Waltham Forest to name a few affected. We can therefore assume that this figure is just the tip of the iceberg.

To our knowledge these figures have never been made public before and indicate the increasing negative effect, and rise in complaints due to a continued increase in flights, and the use of jets at London City Airport. If we compare the increase to the percentage increase in the use of larger, noisier jets at London City Airport, there is a clear correlation.

In 2004 there were just 28% of jets at the airport. By 2007 when the jets made up 50% of flights out of London City Airport complaints more than doubled in one year. With the last percentage of jets being stated at 58% by the CAA in 2008, and complaints having increased by over 2000% since, then it is clear evidence that the activities of London City Airport are disturbing and affecting the quality of life for more and more east and south east Londoners than ever before. What is more this snapshot of complaints from just one source shows that residents complaints have been growing incredibly fast, and have clearly been ignored and played down by Newham Council in discussions over London City Airport expansion.